Moore Financial Solutions Third Quarter 2021
Tyler Moore • October 12, 2021
The third quarter of 2021 looked as if it was on pace for another profitable period, when instead, it began to move lower. The S&P 500 started the quarter at 4,297.50 (the June 30th closing price) and reached a high of 4,545.85 (within the September 2nd trading day). This rise of 5.78% seemed to forecast another quarter providing exponential strength within United States Equities. However, the quarter only
provided a point gain of .23% as it closed September 30th at 4,307.54. The S&P 500 pays a dividend which increases the total return to shareholders above .23%. Moore Financial Solutions uses the S&P 500 as a conversational benchmark for investors’ United States equity exposure and is not referencing a specific managed portfolio. This quarterly report will discuss increasing interest rates, inflation/supply
chain issues, Covid-19, Fed Policy/Taxation, Debt Ceiling, and the Moore F.S. “buy and hold” method to equity investing.
Coincidentally, interest rates took a similar path of increasing within the quarter before coming back down to end the quarter up just slightly. The United States 10-year treasury started the quarter with a 1.469% yield, rose to 1.541% on September 28th and closed the quarter at 1.487%. As interest rates rise, the price of existing bonds will likely decline. While the interest paid on bonds will eventually increase as interest rates go up, many bond investors would be satisfied with this happening gradually. Interest rates increased as Jerome Powell no longer maintained that a tapering of the Fed’s asset purchasing wasn’t on the horizon. Instead, the Fed signaled that a tapering of its asset purchasing program could be happening shortly. Moore F.S. is not surprised by this news as we mentioned in our last quarterly review that this tapering was likely going to be coming in near future Fed meetings. Additionally, Moore F.S. has made a slight tilt to lower duration fixed income tools, while still favoring high credit quality exposure. We believe bonds compliment a portfolio of stocks for our clients who are unable to solely invest in equities, despite having a limited yield and the potential to decline during rising interest rates.
In our Q1 review, we predicted inflation becoming a headwind to companies. As predicted, most companies reported higher costs within the quarter through increased labor costs and/or increased cost of goods. This became further complicated by global supply chain issues and the inability for companies to get much needed products. Last quarter, we referenced the chip shortage for automakers as an
example of this pandemic related constraint. We continue to believe the companies that are maneuverable and flexible will carve a path through these problems. Moore F.S. feels that inflation and supply issues are the main foreseeable threats to American companies, and thus, their share prices.
United States markets kept a close eye on Covid-19 variants, especially the Delta Variant. In this quarter, we have moved from a position of uncertainty surrounding the Delta Variant to increased optimism that we could soon be seeing a Covid-19 antiviral pill, offered by Merck. This news was released on October 1st, 2021. Additionally, some have provided input that the Delta Variant might be the “final wave” of the Covid-19 pandemic. Many businesses reported the Delta Variant impacting their sales and customer flow less impactfully than they had initially forecasted. We remain cautiously optimistic, though uncertain, on the path of Covid-19.
As mentioned, Jerome Powell stated that a tapering of asset purchases is on the horizon. This will reduce easing monetary policy and likely will increase rates somewhat. Companies slightly lose the benefit of cheap money to fund operations when this interest rate increase happens. We believe the interest rate increases have surprised very few, and most have adequately priced this in. Further policy
change conversation surrounding increases in taxes on dividends and capital gains hit equity markets in Q3. It seems the market has digested this information and the potential of these changes are now priced in. Some selling of equities happened when this news began to form. This could potentially be from investors wanting to sell appreciated equity positions at the current capital gains tax level before increases happen or simply due to pricing in a somewhat less favorable opportunity for new money in equities. Moore F.S. understands that changes like this are typically retroactive, potentially because, when the news came out it was already essentially enacted. We believe that this demonstrates the value of the strategy of buying and holding equities, especially in non-retirement/taxable accounts.
Q3 of 2021 marches toward the “Debt Ceiling”, leaving many questions about the future outcome. The “Debt Ceiling” represents the maximum amount of debt the United States Federal Government can have outstanding. Currently, the debt ceiling is set at 28.4 trillion dollars. The results of votes on raising the debt ceiling will likely move markets in the short term. The U.S. faced, and resolved, this problem in 2011, 2013 and 2019, allowing equity markets to aggressively march higher. Moore F.S. believes situations surrounding short-term voting to raise the debt ceiling, or miss payments, is an example of a United States stock market speed bump. This means a pullback in equity prices in the short-term, despite the long-term trajectory of equities historically pointing upward. Some economists would offer that a growing national debt is tolerable if we have a growing gross domestic product. Moore F.S. finds concern with the amount of our spending directly going to pay interest on our debts. In 2019, $375 billion went towards paying interest on our debts. This $1B+ daily cost represented 8.4% of all U.S. federal budget for that year. Moore F.S. remains unimpressed with the trajectory of the amount of U.S. obligations outstanding. U.S. government debt instruments are owned commonly in the form of bills, notes, and bonds in short to long time horizon. Examples of government debt instruments might be seen in shorter term Moore F.S. managed accounts where equities are complimented with fixed income/bonds.
The Moore F.S. strategy continues to be buying and holding companies, or bonds of companies, that will generate earnings within the investors’ timeframe. It is our view that we are in one of the most uncertain times in many of our lives. Fundamentally, when a stock is purchased, its price is determined by the willingness of investors to buy future earnings, or the potential for future earnings. The
willingness to pay upfront for this future benefit, and the amount of future benefit, remain uncertain. We feel that the movement of the S&P 500 from its September 2nd highs to where it closed the month is a reminder that a stock portfolio tends to move higher gradually but fall more rapidly. Moore F.S. sees equity markets being globally focused and ultimately somewhat intertwined. As a result, there will
always be new information coming out globally that will impact stocks held locally. We believe the Q3 example of this was Evergrande, a Chinese development company, who missed interest payments on their bonds on September 23rd. This, and other news, sent waves through global markets as the S&P 500 moved from its closing price on the 23rd (4,448.98) to close the month at 4,307.54. It must be
emphasized that to capture the benefit of equities historically moving higher, the equity investors must be willing to accept that equities will also retract periodically. Moore F.S. generally employs a strategy of buying and holding high quality equities/exchange traded funds (and bonds when necessary) and I personally trade each account with your strategy and goals in mind.
Looking forward into the fourth quarter, we view markets remaining choppy into the holiday season. Our strategy remains to be owning several sectors of the U.S. and global economy due to a lot hinging on uncertainly surrounding Covid-19, lawmaking, etc. We feel if negative headlines do surface, equity investors are prepared to buy the dip. In recent years, the S&P 500 and U.S. equities broadly have shown that many investors are happy to buy a dip, offering support to equity prices. Interest rate environments being so low globally, while inflation is increasing, offer an “only game in town” theme to equities for many investors. This is due to bond yields being low historically and the S&P 500 yielding 1.33% (the yield on the iShares Core S&P 500 ETF). Many investors have a long enough time horizon to buy the hypothetical dip of equities upon negative news. I strive to continue to manage your goals, in the form of your portfolio, to the most prudent of my ability. I plan to reach you by phone to review your portfolio and discuss your goals. Together, we make a great team!
The stock market carousel continued in the second quarter of 2025, with some investors jumping off, while others jumped aboard. Aiming for a solid return to follow a negative 4.59% Q1, the S&P 500 slated a 10.57% return for our second quarter (1). During this most recent quarter, I leaned on my beliefs mentioned fifteen months ago in my Q1 2024 Moore Financial Solutions review; “we feel that investors unknowingly become more faithful in broad U.S. equities to recover after a downturn.” In that previous review I offered a thought that investors have become more trusting that markets will recover after seeing it happen in the 29 historical bear markets, as compared to the first ever bear market, for example. Though my continued theory is that the average bear market duration will decrease over time (with younger investors portfolio managing more assets and algorithmic trading increasing), even I was surprised by the minor 83-day bear market speed bump that the S&P 500 shook off, given that prior to this the average bear market was 289 days (2). The S&P 500 would go on to close Q2 both positive for the year and at record highs. In this quarterly review we’ll look at how bear markets are rarely the same and how our strategy must evolve. We’ll discuss a stubbornly high interest rate, our positioning for potential interest rate decreases, and global matters affecting the market. It’s been said for years that the stock market takes the escalator up and the elevator down. But why? Simply put, this is the result of the driving forces of selling and buying stocks. If investors are optimistic, they’ll commonly allocate to the stock market in an attempt to grow their money. But too much of this buying is deemed greedy and is a great evil of long-term investing. If investors, however, are fearful, they’ll sell their stocks, (at least the less emotionally committed, shorter term investors), driving the price of stocks lower. We believe Q2 is a great example of the battle between fear and greed, and the only real concern is being wrong on predicting short-term market movements. Over the first six trading days of Q2, investors sharply drove the S&P 500 about 11.2% lower, with panic fueled by President Donald Trump’s April 2nd liberation day announcements (3). A resilient S&P 500 would heal the 11.2% wound in only 17 trading days, leaving behind investors who may have been scared out of the market near April 8th closing lows on the S&P 500 of 4,982.77 (4). This would be the first and only closing price below 5,000 on the S&P 500 from April 20th, 2024, to today’s July 1st, 2025, date. In our opinion, this supports our thoughts regarding algorithmic trading, which likely conducted heavy buying at levels of support below 5,000. April 9th would serve as the third largest one-day gain for the S&P 500 in history, increasing by about 9.5% (5). We view the sudden announcements and emotional reactions in the stock market as a great reason to stay the course in our investments. By staying focused on our long-term perspective, while short-term winners and losers argue over the current price, we’ll be less likely to panic and instead willing to accept an average return, rather than attempt to outsmart the market. Moore F.S. was able to capitalize in some situations by selling bonds and buying stocks, when appropriate. While it is not fully determined who lost what, it is implied that a portion of investors locked in losses in Q2, by panic selling with the herd mentality near April 8th lows. These investors would, as a result, miss out on what would become a fruitful Q2 for those willing to wait the required 84 days and not be emotionally rattled.
About thirteen years ago when I started my career as a Financial Services Professional, I was almost instantly astute to the number one factor that determines client success. Of course, this determination was solely my own opinion. I’ve never turned on CNBC and heard scientific data backing it and likely never will. You can nearly ignore researching passive management vs. active management, throw out a comparison of exchange traded funds vs. mutual funds, and forget all about whether a Roth IRA or Traditional IRA suits you best. I believe the number one determinate of success that a client must have is “Proper Expectations”. It is by no coincidence that I believe Moore Financial Solutions clients have extremely reasonable, and ultimately the proper, expectations regarding investing. Investing long term is no casino, rather a patient approach to creating current income and future earnings. Prior to gaining licensure to be on your side financially, I know people that panicked and sold their entire portfolio and moved to cash positions in the Great Recession of 2008-09. They told the story years later to me regarding the vast missed opportunity and harm in locking in the losses. Imagine an investor panicking in Q1 of 2009 and selling stocks below 700 on the S&P 500, an index that is about eight times higher today at 5,635 (1). The S&P 500 would see gains of over 75% in the eleven months to follow, peaking this client’s FOMO and desire to get back into the market, only to sharply drop 16% over the next two months (2). My advice to you, and the number one way I can help you with your investment success, continue not being like this example investor. But rather, stay rooted in your investment philosophy. Realistically, the stages of someone’s investment life are humorous. We typically have little money early on, and it is easy to overcome the emotional impact from the money movement (a 10% decline in a portfolio of $2,500 might equate to a couple days’ earnings). But the problem is, there aren’t ample funds in that portfolio to provide life-changing growth either. For example, last year’s approximately 25% increase in a hypothetical S&P 500 index would have added only $500 to that portfolio. You want to play in the big leagues? Think you can handle the emotional impact of stocks and bonds? Try having an account of $750,000 or $1,000,000. You might want to pick up a fun hobby known for reducing stress, because there are going to be times when your portfolio hits rough spots. But there is good news too. Mathematically, just a 5% return on one million dollars is a gain of $50,000, and the reward for taming the emotional torment is much greater. Sadly, Q1 2025 was a great month to lean on those stress-reducing hobbies because the S&P 500 moved 4.59% lower for the quarter (3). Additionally, the S&P 500 moved 8.66% lower from February 19th, 2025, to the end of Q1 (4). Though the 4.59% has some sting to it, moving down nearly 9% in 40 days undeniably tests the emotional resilience of an investor, and we understand this firsthand. We are excitedly moving forward with this quarterly review to discuss what moved markets, tariffs, and what opportunities may arise. Without question, Wall Street found it very difficult to plan around the Trump tariff shifts. On January 26th, 2025, President Donald Trump announced a 25% tariff on Columbian imports as President Gustavo Petro attempted to decline inbound Columbian migrants. Petro retaliated with a 25% tariff against United States made imports. Shortly after, Petro begrudgingly received the migrants, and the trade dispute 2 ended, providing our president a quick trade war win. Moore F.S. believes this quick victory would go on to fuel President Trump’s confidence using tariffs as weaponry. On February 1st, 2025, President Trump laid the foundation for a 10% China tariff and 25% tariffs on Canada and Mexico. Just two days later the president would signal a 30 day pause on each of our neighbor’s 25% tariff (5). These back-and-forth movements continued off and on for much of the first quarter, with many tariff strategies subjecting only specific industries, e.g. automakers or steel producers, creating not only volatility in the broad stock market but especially within specific industries caught up in the talks. President Trump has labeled April 2nd, 2025, as “liberation day” signaling a big event. Throughout this back-and-forth, Moore Financial Solutions has made every effort not to be on the “wrong side” of the trade and has remained well rooted within our equity portfolio, when appropriate. We view, as mentioned in previous quarterly reviews, the volatility within the stock market as the “cost” or “price” paid emotionally to be able to receive the effective returns stocks could offer. In greater detail, rather than Moore F.S. attempting to time markets or predict the president’s next move and potentially being wrong, we’ll ride the storm out. Although Moore F.S. does not predict a bear market (described as a move down of 20% in the stock market), we point to the resilience of the stock market, overcoming all 29 previous bear markets and having done so rather quickly, taking an average of only 289 days to recover from the drop (6). Though we can’t rely on past market performance to guarantee its future, we believe this reaffirms our approach to using the stock market for clients with a long enough time horizon and ability to pay the emotional “cost” of seeing a portfolio move lower. Moore F.S. has theorized in past quarterly reviews, with no data to back it up, algorithmic trading (computers buying stocks at a “floor” or low point which might give the market support), and a trend of increasingly younger portfolio managers who have only seen speedy recoveries and long bull market rides might reduce the average bear market duration.
